ATM還是DOTM，前者在浪頭上，反而不危險!?
If you're going to get involved in these strategies you need to not be selling far OTM puts due to the inherent convexity of their valuation as they go from being OTM->ATM. People keep thinking that if an option goes in the money somehow the trade has gone wrong and this is false - all that matters is the price of the option when sold vs when bought back. This "never lose" mentality keeps people pursuing "no heat" type trades that become a fucking disaster when vol explodes and the market takes a big dump. You can delude yourself that this doesn't happen often enough to matter but it does and when it does it does badly. Relying on it not to happen at rock bottom VIX is just asking to be taught a lesson.If you sell far OTM options you need to sell *more* in order to collect the same potential premium you'd make from selling a lower amount of ATM options. ATM options are at peak gamma, the rate of damage to your account is not going to be accelerating when the market goes against you whereas with OTM options it *is* going to be accelerating until they eventually become ATM (and beyond) until you either get liquidated, shit your pants, or both. You can easily destroy your entire account trying to juice up these short-dated options to make a "sure thing" return. If there's anything in trading that's to be avoided: it's a sure thing. Nine times out of ten, "sure thing" is a synonym for massive hidden risk.
Now yes, of course you're much more likely to have an ATM option end up ITM but as I said before, all that matters is what you sold it at and what you bought it back at. With an ATM option there's a decent amount of premium there but with these short dated fat out OTM options there's almost no premium at all, but a ton of embedded risk. Nobody who has the ability to survive this long term is selling these things naked, they're delta hedged either with the underlying or indirectly with VIX options or VX futures, spread against unit puts, etc. All they're looking to do is collect the difference between implied vol and realized vol and/or the bid/ask spread of the options themselves. They're not just shorting shit naked and hoping the market doesn't crash next week.
資料來源: elitetrader.com
方法萬千, 各有主張, 無所謂對錯, OTM, ATM, ITM都有人在做
適合自己的個性最重要 --- 違反自己個性的事情, 做起來會很痛苦, 很煎熬的動作如何能 [長期] 做得到? 容易實踐的規則是先認識自己後, 依照個人在操作上的優缺點特製化出來的, [順性] 才能輕鬆做到, 順性才能長久做到, 順性才能一直做到; 不是一套偉大的方法(有這種聖盃嗎?)套上去後, 大家立刻可以[神人上身]的 本帖最後由 sec2100 於 2017-3-31 12:21 編輯
EntrepreneurOPs 發表於 2017-3-31 08:23
方法萬千, 各有主張, 無所謂對錯, OTM, ATM, ITM都有人在做
適合自己的個性最重要 --- 違反自己個性的事情 ...
我同意。但是我也同意有時候下在ATM上是非常好的一種下注法，不過口數一定要小，賭你的信念。甚至於如果你的信念品質夠好的話，下在ITM一檔都可以。不過，錯的話，即使是一口，也需要調整。這幾年下來，我時常用ATM賭我的信念或是增加收益。試著把ATM的單當成是PUT或是BXM策略中的一環行之，你會發現，OP的天空，充滿著繽紛的色彩，眩爛奪目。
關於PUT及BXM的策略連結網頁:
http://www.cboe.com/products/strategy-benchmark-indexes
頁:
[1]