像MACD這些指標都是價格的衍生物，為何不直接觀察價格
本帖最後由 sec2100 於 2017-9-16 08:36 編輯The actual price movement is as precise as can be. Indicators, by design, less so. So why handicap yourself and settle for a tool that is simply derived from the price movement?
I look at price movement as being the heart, and indicators the pulse. And I would rather have the doctor listen to my heart than just feel my pulse!
But on the other hand, if you can't read the price movement, indicators may be your only choice.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/the-reason-i-dont-use-any-indicators.313084/
本帖最後由 sec2100 於 2017-9-16 08:54 編輯
You don't want to "think" while trading. You want to recognize and act. If indicators help that recognition, use them, if they impair, don't use them. "Thinking" is for analysis and development.
本帖最後由 sec2100 於 2017-9-16 08:51 編輯
我也是盤中幾乎完全不看指標的人(但在關鍵時刻會看一些FI、均線、周KD)，我完全看我的選擇權本身沒有沒需要調整。我也沒有第四台，沒有財經台，但我的傳統電視可以接受無線訊號，有台視財經台(就是非凡)。
2008年六月有一天早上，我聽陳小姐的NEWS98.1財經起床號，介紹了一本黑天鵝的書，結果當年大賠。所以現在，我連廣播都不聽了，但我會上網做很多研究，並且儘量讓自己有直觀的方法看走勢圖，直觀的猜它，並且沒有懸念的接受目前的狀況。`
這不包括期交所公佈的一些存量數字，雖然那些存量數字的價值也只比指標好一點點。
最重要的還是我們猜多空的能力，以及管理的方法。
有網友說: 誰說技術指標沒有價值，只是路人甲不會用而己
Indicators have tremendous predictive capabiities. What I have found is that folks who tell you that they don't, do not understand how to use them.
資料來源: buy1sell2 / elitetrader.com
頁:
[1]