Optionshare 選擇幫

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
查看: 1833|回復: 3
打印 上一主題 下一主題

群體智慧預測網站

[複製鏈接]
跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2017-12-31 23:06:29 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式

馬上註冊,結交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕鬆玩轉社區。

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有帳號?立即註冊

x


https://www.almanis.com/
回復

使用道具 舉報

沙發
 樓主| 發表於 2017-12-31 23:11:59 | 只看該作者
經濟學人對該網站的相關報導:

https://www.economist.com/news/b ... groupthink-new-type
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

板凳
 樓主| 發表於 2017-12-31 23:12:43 | 只看該作者
Are crowds full of wisdom or irrational mobs? The answer seems to depend on how their estimates are compiled. If their guesses are generated independently (the number of jelly beans in a jar, the weight of a cow at the country fair), then the crowd can be pretty accurate. But things can change if people are aware of others’ opinions. There is a tendency towards “anchoring” (basing one’s estimate on a fixed number, such as the average guess) and overshooting (the process that creates bubbles and crashes in financial markets).
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

地板
 樓主| 發表於 2017-12-31 23:43:45 | 只看該作者
A new website, Almanis, takes a different approach. Those who join are given an allocation of 1,000 points which they can stake to back their forecasts on the probability of political, business and economic events occurring. Predictions are not merely a matter of saying Yes or No. The more points forecasters stake, the further they can move the “price” of an event, meaning the collective reckoning of its probability. This may reduce the tendency for anchoring in forecasts, since participants will be rewarded if they successfully go against the consensus.
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

站長信箱|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|Optionshare 選擇幫.  

GMT+8, 2024-4-23 14:50 , Processed in 0.065200 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表