Optionshare 選擇幫

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
查看: 2632|回復: 7

測一測你的人格類型: 如果是INTJ,則很適合當交易員

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2017-7-23 22:46:16 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式

馬上註冊,結交更多好友,享用更多功能,讓你輕鬆玩轉社區。

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有帳號?立即註冊

x
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2017-7-24 11:22:53 | 顯示全部樓層
不敢置信我是INTJ
Introvert(9%)  iNtuitive(25%)  Thinking(25%)  Judging(34%)
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2017-7-24 11:25:19 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 sec2100 於 2017-7-24 11:26 編輯

期客,恭禧你。能成為INTJ的人只有1%。
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTJ

回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2017-7-24 13:39:01 | 顯示全部樓層
我也是INTJ


Your Type


INTJ

Introvert(31%)  iNtuitive(16%)  Thinking(28%)  Judging(6%)
•You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (31%)
•You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (16%)
•You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (28%)
•You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (6%)
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2017-7-24 13:48:47 | 顯示全部樓層
不過感覺上好像很多交易員填上開問卷的結果都會是INTJ
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2017-7-24 15:08:50 | 顯示全部樓層
沒想到我一直覺得自己怪,但不知道怪在哪裡
可能是性格使然

這是完整介紹16種性格

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E ... 6%E9%A1%9E%E6%B3%95
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2017-10-8 16:50:15 | 顯示全部樓層
20171008四天連假,閒來無事,再做了一遍首則的連結人格類型測驗,仍然是INTJ。
http://www.humanmetrics.com/pers ... amp;TF=34&JP=19


20171008再做一遍還是INTJ.JPG
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2017-10-8 16:57:44 | 顯示全部樓層
INTJ的描述


Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging

To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.

INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.

In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.

(INTJ stands for Introvert, iNtuitive, Thinking, Judging and represents individual's preferences in four dimensions characterising personality type, according to Jung's and Briggs Myers' theories of personality type.)

http://www.humanmetrics.com/personality/intj
回復 支持 反對

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

站長信箱|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|Optionshare 選擇幫.  

GMT+8, 2024-5-30 12:37 , Processed in 0.025102 second(s), 22 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表